I wanted more, but Kalani did just enough. 3 of 4 years with a winning record, likely 2 straight years of improvement, great ambassador, our school's biggest fan, the kids love him, some signature wins, despite some head-scratching losses.

To move away from that you'd have had to have someone in your back pocket you knew could take the program forward, and I'm not sure there is. I'm not making excuses for mediocrity, but just saying if you go back to ground zero you know you've got to find someone that *after 4 more years of re-building* you're very confident can do better than 7-6, especially if you're seeing an upward trend (and arguably we are). That was my argument why not to fire Bronco (before he quit)--replacing a guy with 9 wins a season is *hard*. Replacing a guy with 7 wins isn't as hard, but it still begs the question "who?," and the answer's not obvious.