The opposite actually (link)...

Feb 17, 2020
10:57:41pm

Oceanographer All-American

9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking World Trade Center Myths

Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.

https://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center[https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/]

The steel didn't melt, but it became weakened and brittle, thus unable to support the weight of the building.

Side note: Jones was one of my favorite professors at BYU. However, that doesn't make his 9/11 theory any less loony.

Report problem with this ad

Oceanographer

Bio page: Oceanographer
Joined: Oct 19, 2011
Last login: Apr 28, 2024
Total posts: 5,940 (2,929 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Youtube video of my old BYU physics professor Steven Jones

Zoobieman

2/17/20 8:58pm

Those steel beams though.

AD4

2/17/20 9:02pm

But jet fuel for real can’t burn hot enough

shammy

2/17/20 9:08pm

RE: But jet fuel for real can’t burn hot enough

joelvandyne

2/17/20 9:23pm

I thought there was a peer reviewed paper and reproducible results?

Zoobieman

2/17/20 9:29pm

The opposite actually (link)...

Oceanographer

2/17/20 10:57pm

And he didn’t get canned until he started to attribute motive to the towers

LaserCoug

2/18/20 7:40am

My post didn't mention anything about steel beams. . .

Zoobieman

2/18/20 8:59am

Interesting. However, in reading (glancing?) through the papers it seems to me

9/11 Conspiracy Theories - Debunking World Trade Center Myths

Posting on CougarBoard