If the Big 10 saw value in Oregon and Washington, they would have been included

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jul 5, 2022
12:29:54pm

Skeptical Optimist Intervention Needed

If the Big 10 saw value in Oregon and Washington, they would have been included

in the conversations with USC and UCLA. Doesn't the fact that they weren't suggest that the B1G has no intention of adding them to the conference?

Report problem with this ad

Skeptical Optimist

Previous username: workindev
Bio page: Skeptical Optimist
Joined: Aug 2, 2006
Last login: May 3, 2024
Total posts: 79,070 (4,240 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

If the Big 10 saw value in Oregon and Washington, they would have been included

Skeptical Optimist

7/5/22 12:29pm

Big 10 waiting on ND and will wait as long as they need to

Captain Stubing

7/5/22 12:31pm

The Love Boat captain is correct

TNT

7/5/22 12:48pm

How do you know they weren't or haven't been in some level of conversations now?

Baron

7/5/22 12:33pm

Because they were allegedly blindsided by the USC/UCLA move

Skeptical Optimist

7/5/22 12:40pm

"allegedly" And that still doesn't mean they don't have value later. Just not until they lock up USC and UCLA.

Baron

7/5/22 12:47pm

Unless they knew that taking the So Cal schools would implode the PAC and force

stenso

7/5/22 12:34pm

Maybe, except the Big10 is outspokenly kumbayaa about their equal sharing.

7/5/22 12:37pm

I don't think necessarily so. USC and UCLA approached and I think the TEN may

rocker

7/5/22 12:41pm

That seems to be the logic, but one can never know.

Little Mac

7/5/22 12:43pm

The Big-10 had to agree not to take any other WC schools

CougarGregor

7/5/22 12:48pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad