is not my problem.
I have stuck to a single subject. I have referenced other subjects to prove my point.
And no, there was no exculpatory evidence that proved he was not an accomplice, but I like how you threw that in there like there was. How dishonest of you!
Domo may have been let off the actual armed robbery charge due to exculpatory evidence but he was never charged as an accomplice so he couldn't have possible been let off for that, but keep telling yourself he was. Also, OJ not let off due to lack of evidence maybe you don't remember that trial very well.