But my point was neither he nor Bradley ever was really "worthy" of a #1 or #2 pick. And if you are going to include Bradley, what's the argument for not including Van Horn (I realize you acknowledged Bradley didn't belong on this list). They both lasted 10+ years in the league, they both made all-rookie teams, and they both had years where they had solid numbers (Bradley's years of 12+ ppg, 3.5+ bpg, and 8+ rpg were pretty solid).

But neither of them ever made an all star team, won a championship, etc.