Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up
Apr 17, 2014
9:20:03am
Answer me this. What harm does allowing athletes to market themselves do?
If they were allowed to be in commercials, sign deals w/ apparel lines, etc, who exactly is harmed by that? I get why people such as yourself are uncomfortable with the idea of colleges paying their players AFTER providing an education. But I fail to understand why an entire system is set up to see that college athletes MUST make NO money. Would Jimmer have had any companies wanting to cash in on Jimmer-mania his senior year were it legal? My guess is absolutely! So who exactly does it harm for them to get royalties on their jersey sales, or a piece of the video game pie, etc?

There is not a valid argument to be had about the supposed morality of making money for playing sports once one is out of college, but not making a dime while in college. That entire notion is made up to ensure that whatever money IS made goes into the pockets of the NCAA without paying a dime of it going into players' pockets. And why? Well, simply because they can.
This message has been modified
Originally posted on Apr 17, 2014 at 9:20:03am
Message modified by getemcougs24 on Apr 17, 2014 at 9:20:31am
getemcougs24
New username
Seaward
Bio page
getemcougs24
Joined
Aug 31, 2011
Last login
Sep 11, 2015
Total posts
0 (0 FO)
Messages
Author
Time

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.