Talk about a troll. First off I am sorry I am taking up so much space in your head - and second - talk about mischaracterizing. Let me clarify for you instead of you completely misunderstanding my opinion.

96 - great year and one of the best schedules ever. Two traditional teams in aTm and UW. One pretty good team in WY and a comparable "New Elite" team in KState. That is 4 good teams and a lot of garbage.

This year - One traditional team that may or may not have a good season but they definitely have the talent to. 3 Pretty good teams in Houston, Boise, UCF and 2 teams that may be better than advertised in UVA and Cal. Of course this all remains to be seen.

SOS is currently harder than the 96 SOS. So basically I think this year does not have as good a top team as 96 but it has better competition across the board. In past years we were thrilled to have a team like UVA or GT on the schedule once in a season. This year we have 5 teams in that category and one of those teams is among the best programs in college football.

It always amazes me that "fans" complain that we don't have enough of something we have never had in the first place.

That is what wapiti was saying about TX - sorry that your reading comprehension skills aren't up to the CB standard.