My Account
Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Sep 19, 2014
11:45
:52
am
fredgarvin
You're right, they can only review if targeting was called.
Stupid rule. If they're going to review that, they should review all ejections.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
fredgarvin
Bio page
fredgarvin
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Last login
Sep 20, 2024
Total posts
19,058 (44 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
Why wasn't Koroma's Non-Punch reviewed during the game?
dallasbyu
9/19/14 11:42am
Two over turned ejections would have been too embarrassing
JackStack
9/19/14 11:44am
I don't think penalties are reviewable
SoCalCoug
9/19/14 11:44am
except for determining whether there was targeting, apparently
SoCalCoug
9/19/14 11:45am
You're right, they can only review if targeting was called.
fredgarvin
9/19/14 11:45am
there's a specific rule written that targeting gets video review
NanoFab Coug
9/19/14 11:46am
I think any penalty that can result in an ejection should be reviewed
dallasbyu
9/19/14 11:45am
This is my understanding. Penalties leading to ejections should all be
unctoothman
9/19/14 11:46am
hack
unctoothman
9/19/14 11:46am
This might cost us a playoff spot. Stupid refs.
Indy Coug
9/19/14 11:46am
The funny thing is that the ref that threw the flag
dallasbyu
9/19/14 11:48am
Watching the replay it sure looks like he cocks back his
Fdnman
9/19/14 11:50am
No fist was made, no contact was made. No punch possible.
OptimisTIC
9/19/14 12:30pm
it looked like a punch to me. closed fist everything.
bald man
9/19/14 11:56am
No. I believe he the suspension was overturned because he wasn't fighting
SpiffCoug
9/19/14 12:14pm
AGain. There was no punch.
OptimisTIC
9/19/14 12:31pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad