mediocrity? THat's what people don't get when they say "his record is just as good as LaVell's" (which is becoming more and more untrue every loss) or "at least he's not Crowton" (which is also becoming slowly less true).

Is continuing in the downward trend of LaVell's last few years good enough? Is being sex scandal-free good enough? Is barely getting by with winning records (2010, likely 2014) good enough?