again, diff O. If you don't agree w my opinion that RA lacks flexibility, in game adjustments, and a post TA strategy for beating middle tier MWC teams at home, that's fine. My beef 75/25 w BM over RA. But, some of the most CFB savvy people I know are RAs biggest critics, not the other way around. People that have played and coached, but that's beside the point.

The D has collapsed worse than the O, but make no mistake, the O is in utter disarray and woefully unprepared to compete post TH injury. We could go back and forth, but the results speak louder than either of our opinions. Also, theres a reason RA didn't land an OC gig before or after RA 1.0, and I'd be surprised if he does w an FBS program post 2.0 either. I'll be the first to applaud if he puts a winning O on the field going forward this year. One thing I'm sure of, if he doesn't, therell be the usual chorus of woulda couldas, listing injuries, reffs, and circumstances as the sole reason for the embarrassing failure we've seen on both sides of the ball. But again, it's BM that rehired someone who didn't work out the first time, that's why my frustration w Riley or any of the Coord. failures is far less than w BM.

Scoreboard, that's all there is. Woulda couldas and what ifs are for gambling. If my aunt had family jewels, she'd be my uncle. Actually, that's a bad comparison. My aunt just might, but you get my drift. I don't know whether to applaud or ridicule the CB'ers that are still playing "All is well in Provo" as the ship rolls over and sinks.