They could conclusively determine it was short? If Bryant's TD catch was

Report problem with this ad

Nov 23, 2014
9:50:14pm

ocmyhome

They could conclusively determine it was short? If Bryant's TD catch was

inconclusive (and thus a touch down) then there's no way this catch is conclusively determined to be short...

Report problem with this ad

ocmyhome

Bio page: ocmyhome
Joined: Nov 1, 2006
Last login: May 17, 2024
Total posts: 10,828 (65 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

They could conclusively determine it was short? If Bryant's TD catch was

ocmyhome

11/23/14 9:50pm

Nah, that was easily short. I didn't watch the Bryant replay but the 2 aren't

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 9:51pm

It was clear he never crossed the 30, easy call.

Duke Silver

11/23/14 9:51pm

Even at the high point of the catch? IMO not conclusive at all... Sure, it

ocmyhome

11/23/14 9:53pm

That doesn't matter because the player brought the ball back behind the 30

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 9:54pm

highpoint of the catch isn't a catch. he has to come down before it's a catch.

macaroni

11/23/14 9:59pm

I think it's marked at where it's caught, and the players feet being in is only

ocmyhome

11/23/14 10:15pm

You're missing the point though. He very well could've crossed the 30

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 10:22pm

I understood that point, I don't think that's how they mark it, especially

ocmyhome

11/23/14 10:36pm

That is in fact how it is marked.

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 10:38pm

it's where he comes down. They said it during the broadcast

macaroni

11/24/14 6:50am

I did not think he made it but I did not think video was conclusive

Busiturtle

11/24/14 4:48am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad