I think it's marked at where it's caught, and the players feet being in is only

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Nov 23, 2014
10:15:31pm

ocmyhome

I think it's marked at where it's caught, and the players feet being in is only

to determine whether he's inbound or not. But like everyone's saying how it was clear, I just don't agree w/ that...

Report problem with this ad

ocmyhome

Bio page: ocmyhome
Joined: Nov 1, 2006
Last login: May 7, 2024
Total posts: 10,826 (65 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

They could conclusively determine it was short? If Bryant's TD catch was

ocmyhome

11/23/14 9:50pm

Nah, that was easily short. I didn't watch the Bryant replay but the 2 aren't

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 9:51pm

It was clear he never crossed the 30, easy call.

Duke Silver

11/23/14 9:51pm

Even at the high point of the catch? IMO not conclusive at all... Sure, it

ocmyhome

11/23/14 9:53pm

That doesn't matter because the player brought the ball back behind the 30

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 9:54pm

highpoint of the catch isn't a catch. he has to come down before it's a catch.

macaroni

11/23/14 9:59pm

I think it's marked at where it's caught, and the players feet being in is only

ocmyhome

11/23/14 10:15pm

You're missing the point though. He very well could've crossed the 30

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 10:22pm

I understood that point, I don't think that's how they mark it, especially

ocmyhome

11/23/14 10:36pm

That is in fact how it is marked.

Walter Bellhaven

11/23/14 10:38pm

it's where he comes down. They said it during the broadcast

macaroni

11/24/14 6:50am

I did not think he made it but I did not think video was conclusive

Busiturtle

11/24/14 4:48am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad