My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Nov 23, 2014
10:22
:42
pm
Walter Bellhaven
You're missing the point though. He very well could've crossed the 30
But he came back behind the 30 by his own power. Once he did this, he was tackled and never reached the 30 again. Very clear to see.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Walter Bellhaven
Previous username
The Dan Man
Bio page
Walter Bellhaven
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Last login
Jul 6, 2017
Total posts
43,168 (716 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
They could conclusively determine it was short? If Bryant's TD catch was
ocmyhome
11/23/14 9:50pm
Nah, that was easily short. I didn't watch the Bryant replay but the 2 aren't
Walter Bellhaven
11/23/14 9:51pm
It was clear he never crossed the 30, easy call.
Duke Silver
11/23/14 9:51pm
Even at the high point of the catch? IMO not conclusive at all... Sure, it
ocmyhome
11/23/14 9:53pm
That doesn't matter because the player brought the ball back behind the 30
Walter Bellhaven
11/23/14 9:54pm
highpoint of the catch isn't a catch. he has to come down before it's a catch.
macaroni
11/23/14 9:59pm
I think it's marked at where it's caught, and the players feet being in is only
ocmyhome
11/23/14 10:15pm
You're missing the point though. He very well could've crossed the 30
Walter Bellhaven
11/23/14 10:22pm
I understood that point, I don't think that's how they mark it, especially
ocmyhome
11/23/14 10:36pm
That is in fact how it is marked.
Walter Bellhaven
11/23/14 10:38pm
it's where he comes down. They said it during the broadcast
macaroni
11/24/14 6:50am
I did not think he made it but I did not think video was conclusive
Busiturtle
11/24/14 4:48am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad