Your first sentence gives the object of your post...stating Haws injury is exactly why Rose's system doesn't work. Then you talk about Rose's defensive scheme for the rest of your post.

I agree that defense is a key problem. I disagree with your first sentence, which seems to place an unusual weight on Haws injury--which Rose had nothing to do with and cannot remedy.

Furthermore, I don't see the connection between the two ideas. Furthermore, we have not even played a game yet. What are you going to do when Crazy Legs Halford comes out and drops 25pts on Stanford...but I digress.