Which makes me wish I hadn't spent all that time trying to walk you step by step through my point. Against all of my better judgment I will try one more time, inevitably a waste of time, but I'll try. I'll use numbering and, on occasion, capital letters for emphasis and to hopefully hold your low attention span:

1. You DO understand i wasn't responding to the OP, I was responding to Indy Coug, right?

2. Of course 9 out of 250 isn't a lot. But the 9 out of 250 is NOT what I was talking about when I responded to INDY COUG'S post. Indy coug's post is the one that immediately precedes my post. You can see it if you look that my post is a branch off of Indy Coug's post. You'll see I said, "That would be much more telling."

3. That was to say, implicitly, "more telling than GW's stat." Which was to say, GW's stat DOESN'T SHOW THE WHOLE PICTURE. Which is why my post was not about the 9/250 that you keep harping about. In the post you didn't bother to read earlier I explained in much more detail than you deserved, that there have been quite a few close games that BYU has lost - particularly this year. I even referenced your own earlier post about Dellavadova and how we led by 4 points as just another data point of how GW's initial stat doesn't tell the whole story. I thought your own post might get your attention. i guess not.

4. If you still don't understand, carefully read all the posts in this thread one more time. No, I mean actually READ them.

Go look at my post history and find out just what a byu basher I am. Good grief you are a delicate little thing if you think bemoaning BYU's inability to close out some games over the past few years = "byu bashing"

PS I don't normally respond this way but if you're going to (1) go after me in condescending posts that demonstrate your refusal or inability to actually read and comprehend what I am saying, and (2) then make wild accusations that i am a "byu basher", I will lose patience with you.