My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more!
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 6, 2015
3:16
:12
pm
Twin Roots
None whatsoever
How did it give Seattle any kind of competitive advantage? Instead of batting it as he was coached to do, he could have covered it up. Same result either way so what's the difference.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Twin Roots
New username
Pro Logic
Bio page
Twin Roots
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Last login
Sep 24, 2019
Total posts
0 (0 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
The bottom line is, refs make mistakes. You win some and you lose some
Sea Chicken
10/6/15 1:00pm
unless you're seattle, then you always win...
1984coug
10/6/15 1:03pm
You forgot to mention last year's super bowl. Wait, they lost.
Dr taylore90
10/6/15 1:09pm
They lost a Super Bowl on calls so bad that the ref later apologized
wabluecoug
10/6/15 1:23pm
how is simultaneous possession defined? did the NFL come out and say that
BertoChavez
10/6/15 1:24pm
Imagine Seahawk fans if the roles had been reversed last night...
RichieRich
10/6/15 1:06pm
They'd all go back to their original teams
1984coug
10/6/15 1:06pm
I'd say, well that sucks.
Twin Roots
10/6/15 1:22pm
That play had no effect on the game? Seriously?
RichieRich
10/6/15 1:23pm
None whatsoever
Twin Roots
10/6/15 3:16pm
That's not the point. Stupid rule or not, it's a rule and thus a blown no call.
RichieRich
10/6/15 3:29pm
i heard the UCONN guy DID kick it in the stands. in the stadium
fattycoug
10/6/15 4:23pm
Seemed like a little kick that landed in one of the first few rows.
BertoChavez
10/6/15 4:32pm
BM Super Bowl XL - refs are still trying to make up for that.
Thunder Buddy
10/6/15 1:23pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad