Oct 8, 2015
3:08:46pm
3:08:46pm
Isn't it easier to defend Taysom+Tanner than Taysom+Jamaal?
I'm not sure having 2 QBs in the backfield (if that's what you are suggesting) really gives you that much more than you get with Taysom + a running back. Put 2 QBs in and you someone else has to sit down (either your RB or a receiver). With Taysom you already have a dual run/pass threat. The problem in defending a dual threat QB is that might run it, requiring your defense to step up and stop the run, or he might throw it, requiring your defense to stay in coverage. Forcing the defense to make that choice is what puts pressure on the defense.
Adding another QB while losing a RB or a receiver doesn't really enhance the dual threat you already have with Taysom. You just lose another offensive option.
Adding another QB while losing a RB or a receiver doesn't really enhance the dual threat you already have with Taysom. You just lose another offensive option.
- Bio page
- Tricky
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2009
- Last login
- May 3, 2024
- Total posts
- 21,956 (137 FO)
Messages
Time
10/8/15 12:54pm
10/8/15 12:55pm
10/8/15 12:59pm
10/8/15 1:09pm
10/8/15 1:41pm
10/8/15 5:03pm
10/8/15 1:49pm
10/8/15 1:57pm
10/8/15 2:18pm
10/8/15 12:58pm
10/8/15 2:23pm
10/8/15 12:59pm
10/8/15 1:03pm
10/8/15 1:12pm
10/8/15 1:12pm
10/8/15 1:25pm
10/8/15 1:26pm
10/8/15 1:28pm
10/8/15 1:35pm
10/8/15 1:52pm
10/8/15 2:42pm
10/8/15 3:04pm
10/8/15 3:22pm
10/8/15 5:14pm