stats, or logic. I mean, you give me an argument that is totally based off your point of view and then are critical of anyone who might disagree and call us "blue-goggled"? It's a he said/she said argument.

Does it occur to you that perhaps teams were unfamiliar with Mangum in the beginning?

Does it occur that as Mangum develops there are route intracacies that need to be honed and that Mangum is growing before our eyes as he figures out where receivers are supposed to be when he throws the ball?

Does it occur to you that because a few of these stumbles that his confidence can be shaken causing some inconsistencies in his throws?

Does it occur to you that he's had to adjust and alter his game plan every week, make sure he's physically capable of implementing the game plan, learned an offense, and dealt with personal injuries week in and week out? This after only returning to competitive football 4 months ago?!?!

What Mangum has done and continues to do is mind-blowing considering the factors that go into performance on the field.

I just can't believe you're being critical of him, because who knows where we'd be with Hoge at the helm, and I like Hoge, but he was nowhere close to Mangum.