Nov 28, 2015
11:34:50am
11:34:50am
I don't think we are disagreeing here. I think you think I am defending O'Reilly
I'm not. We are both saying the same thing here.
ETA: I was a history major. So I think if you look at what I wrote before in that context, you will see that what I said is quite damning. I think my overall point is that these aren't history books. As a history major, I can't take them seriously as histories. They are entertainment. And as for the O'Reilly-Will debate, they both came off bad IMO.
ETA: I was a history major. So I think if you look at what I wrote before in that context, you will see that what I said is quite damning. I think my overall point is that these aren't history books. As a history major, I can't take them seriously as histories. They are entertainment. And as for the O'Reilly-Will debate, they both came off bad IMO.
Originally posted on Nov 28, 2015 at 11:34:50am
Message modified by neopolitech on Nov 28, 2015 at 11:46:57am
- Bio page
- neopolitech
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2015
- Last login
- Dec 29, 2023
- Total posts
- 853 (45 FO)
