Oct 24, 2016
12:43:37am
12:43:37am
No, the "facts" are that they take the second best team.
You said above:
"There is no tie breaker for this (sic) pac12 bowls....
The bowls choose whomever it is they want in the order of the prestige of the bowl."
This is incorrect. In the case of the Pac 12 Champ going to the CFP, the Rose Bowl substitute goes by conference record.
So, yes it is possible that the loser of pac 12 champ game would not be in the Rose if there is another "better" team in the opposite division. I believe this happened the year when Oregon was in the CFP, UCLA lost in the Pac12 Champ game and Stanford went to the Rose Bowl.
And the name calling isn't necessary.
"There is no tie breaker for this (sic) pac12 bowls....
The bowls choose whomever it is they want in the order of the prestige of the bowl."
This is incorrect. In the case of the Pac 12 Champ going to the CFP, the Rose Bowl substitute goes by conference record.
So, yes it is possible that the loser of pac 12 champ game would not be in the Rose if there is another "better" team in the opposite division. I believe this happened the year when Oregon was in the CFP, UCLA lost in the Pac12 Champ game and Stanford went to the Rose Bowl.
And the name calling isn't necessary.
Originally posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 12:43:37am
Message modified by LiquidUte on Oct 24, 2016 at 12:49:02am
Message modified by LiquidUte on Oct 24, 2016 at 12:53:12am
Message modified by LiquidUte on Oct 24, 2016 at 12:53:41am
- Bio page
- LiquidUte
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2009
- Last login
- Dec 22, 2020
- Total posts
- 515 (1 FO)
Messages
Time
10/23/16 4:43pm
10/23/16 4:55pm
10/23/16 4:55pm
10/23/16 5:04pm
10/23/16 5:41pm
10/23/16 5:55pm
10/23/16 6:11pm
10/24/16 12:43am
10/24/16 9:10am
10/24/16 5:20am
10/24/16 9:12am
10/24/16 9:34am
10/24/16 9:41am
10/23/16 6:09pm
10/23/16 7:18pm
10/23/16 7:16pm
10/23/16 7:24pm
10/23/16 7:58pm
10/24/16 8:16am
10/24/16 8:29am