You can disagree all you want but it was intentional and did not

Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Feb 27, 2017
9:41:20pm

PortlandCoug All-American

You can disagree all you want but it was intentional and did not

appear to be done in anger. That to me translates into "don't let him get going." Probably not what Rose wanted but the act itself was so surprisingly deliberate that it looked premeditated.

Also, if you look at Mika's reaction with the player next to him it seems pretty obvious that he was just trying to prevent an easy basket.

Report problem with this ad

PortlandCoug

Bio page: PortlandCoug
Joined: Mar 5, 2001
Last login: Apr 28, 2024
Total posts: 21,469 (52 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Mika's flagrant wasn't.

Iman23

2/27/17 9:15pm

Sure it was.

RalphWiggam

2/27/17 9:16pm

A foul below the waist - how can that be flagrant? Karnowski just flopped becaus

Iman23

2/27/17 9:20pm

1 - It wasn't below the waist. It was on his arm. 2 - "above the waist" is

benny1982

2/27/17 9:23pm

<< Deleted >>

Abe Froman

2/27/17 9:40pm

Oh good grief, that's not what I said. The foul didn't occur below his waist

benny1982

2/27/17 9:42pm

<< Deleted >>

Abe Froman

2/27/17 9:47pm

Sorry. Didn't see the joke. I get so used to people on here saying really

benny1982

2/27/17 9:48pm

Why can't a foul below the waist be flagrant? He made no play on the ball.

cougfanblue

2/27/17 9:23pm

The crotch is below the waist, and a knee to the crotch is a flagrant foul.

jdub

2/27/17 9:51pm

What if ball contact occurred first?

Cthack1

2/28/17 1:04am

you're going to have to be more specific.

jdub

2/28/17 7:51am

Excessive contact doesn't have to be above the waist #1. #2 there was no

TheLoneCougar

2/28/17 7:56am

<< Deleted >>

JimmyZ

2/28/17 7:54am

25 years ago it wasn't a flagrant but now that gets called 9 times out 10

rov

2/27/17 9:18pm

Even 25 years ago you had to pretend to be going after the ball.

kccougar

2/27/17 9:21pm

Bill Laimbeer wouldn't survive in basketball today

Mark320

2/27/17 9:30pm

He didn't make a play on the ball. That's the definition of a flagrant foul.

dilbert

2/27/17 9:20pm

Flagrant 1 is the same as the old "intentional foul." Mika's foul clearly qualifies.

roseyscenario

2/27/17 9:25pm

Yes, it was obviously intentional and done on purpose

2/27/17 9:37pm

Corbin made the giant look slow; Mika made him look petrified. In

mantis mutu

2/28/17 12:57am

Yes, and Mika was instructed to do it so that K. didn't get going again

2/27/17 9:30pm

Proof that he was instructed to do it?

benny1982

2/27/17 9:32pm

Just watch the reaction, it's obvious

2/27/17 9:36pm

Ha ha. No.

benny1982

2/27/17 9:37pm

You can disagree all you want but it was intentional and did not

2/27/17 9:41pm

Of course it was intentional. But not for some conspiratorial reason.

benny1982

2/27/17 9:43pm

Coaches tell players all the time to foul, have you not watched the NBA?

2/27/17 9:46pm

Wrong. Mika got beat on the play and he was tired of getting hooked all night

TheLoneCougar

2/28/17 9:08am

You mean this reaction?

dilbert

2/27/17 9:43pm

I thought it was a reaction to getting hit with Karnowski's shoulder one more

dilbert

2/27/17 9:37pm

Yeah, Karnowski was using his shoulder and elbow up in Mika's shoulder

benny1982

2/27/17 9:39pm

Since it was so obviously done on purpose it looked very premeditated

2/27/17 9:44pm

Oh, ok. Now I understand what you are saying.

dilbert

2/27/17 9:47pm

The way you say it is very different from how he seems to be saying it.

benny1982

2/27/17 9:50pm

I never said Rose told him to intentionally foul anyone

2/27/17 9:52pm

You weren't really all that clear in your meaning, so it was pretty easy

benny1982

2/27/17 9:53pm

Fair enough

2/27/17 9:55pm

Yeah, it wasn't a sweep the leg moment, just foul him so he doesn't

2/27/17 9:50pm

If you had said it that way to begin with, I would have never disagreed.

benny1982

2/27/17 9:52pm

Yes, that's all I was saying

2/27/17 9:53pm

I think this is a half truth. I think the coaches told him he had no fouls, so

QBarrister

2/28/17 8:33am

Flagrant but not dirty. It was a good play, and correctly officiated.

CalGTR

2/27/17 10:51pm

Exactly. It was textbook flagrant, but with no intent to harm (or really any

spoxjox

2/27/17 11:08pm

Mika told me on Sunday that because he pulled him down with 2 hands instead

kerm

2/27/17 10:51pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad