No. He was a lazy director. Two camera angles. No location shoots. Just all green screen done on the cheap.

Report problem with this ad

May 4, 2017
7:58:39pm

SpiffCoug All-American

Report problem with this ad

SpiffCoug

New username: Spiff
Bio page: SpiffCoug
Joined: Sep 12, 2002
Last login: Jul 24, 2021
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Star Wars Episode III observations:

RSLCoug Not a Soccer Fan

5/4/17 11:57am

George Lucas is a visual effects guy who directs and produces movies. That's how

SandYFan

5/4/17 12:00pm

That probably the best insight I've read about George Lucas

mudpupper

5/4/17 12:29pm

No. He was a lazy director. Two camera angles. No location shoots. Just all green screen done on the cheap.

SpiffCoug

5/4/17 7:58pm

Exactly, his focus was on special effects and not much else

mudpupper

5/5/17 8:02am

Check out these questions on Quora.

Wadds

5/4/17 12:02pm

Link for that?

RSLCoug

5/4/17 12:06pm

Here's a start:

SandYFan

5/4/17 12:16pm

In other words: Star Wars is better w/o the prequels.

Bert609

5/4/17 12:29pm

Giving Lucas too much power turned out poorly. Surprise?

SandYFan

5/4/17 12:33pm

Here's a few:

Wadds

5/4/17 2:25pm

I just noticed that too the other day when I saw that scene again.

mudpupper

5/4/17 12:30pm

They're used to relying on the force to give them a preview of what's coming,

tassell

5/4/17 1:09pm

He had his lightsaber out for a full 10 seconds, and was standing before them for at least 4 seconds.

Posting on CougarBoard