It is common sense. We all know a single ACL injury is not easy to come back from, now we are talking about 3. Your bias towards the Fano's is clearly evident that you can't let common sense rule.

But if you want statistics, here are some pretty simple ones from the study abstract:

Results: Overall, 312 NFL players were included in this study, and 174 (55.8%) returned to play. Of the eligible players, only 28.5% (n = 59/207) remained in the league 3 years postinjury. Within the first 3 years postinjury, players played in fewer games (8.7 vs 13.7; P < .0001), started in fewer games (3.0 vs 8.3; P < .0001), had lower AVs (1.5 vs 4.3; P < .0001), and had decreased snap counts (259.0 vs 619.0; P < .0001) compared with preinjury. Quarterbacks were most likely to return to play (92.9% vs 53.7%; P = .0040) and to return to performance (2% vs 50% decrease in AV; P = .0165) compared with the other positions. Running backs had the largest decrease in AV (90.5%), followed by defensive linemen (76.2%) and linebackers (62.5%).

From the article: Return to Play and Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in National Football League Players
Kush S Mody, Amanda N Fletcher, Craig C Akoh, Selene G Parekh

Your comment: "You are too funny. Yes the 4 star stud who has performed well in limited game time has a better chance at being a star than guys we bring up from Weber St. Shocking I know. I better explain it more."

(let's not mention he actually transferred from Boise State... facts really don't matter in your conversations)

Yes please do, because I never brought up Bagnah. He isn't relevant to this conversation at all. Just another strawman you randomly and from left field, throughout there. Absolutely has no relevance to this conversation. We are talking about Fano and your anointing of a star. I don't care about Bagnah at all. Glad he plays for us and that is about it.