My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more!
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
May 22, 2024
7:28
:24
am
LeonMarek
All-American
more layovers = more chances of it being delayed, especially in O'Hare
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
LeonMarek
Bio page
LeonMarek
Joined
Aug 11, 2014
Last login
Jun 19, 2024
Total posts
8,598 (391 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
POLL: Which option would you choose?
rainorsnow
May 22, 7:26am
more layovers = more chances of it being delayed, especially in O'Hare
LeonMarek
May 22, 7:28am
There’s a saying “you got time to spare? Go through O’hare!”
Jfly1975
May 22, 7:36am
No time to spare avoid O’Hare
Archaea
May 22, 7:58am
I have to make this choice a few times a month. Layovers suck
SBB
May 22, 7:44am
Depends on how crowded the airport in option 1 is ..
ChiefBeef
May 22, 7:47am
I voted option 2
TheHop
May 22, 7:47am
I can't imagine driving to an airport that far.
Genghis Spreads
May 22, 7:50am
I did a 3 hr drive to the airport this weekend i stead of direct. Resulted in
Plato
May 22, 8:01am
We often drive down to SLC from Jackson, Wy
jxncoog
May 22, 8:23am
2 hours is my upper bound
Genghis Spreads
May 22, 9:10am
Anyone who flies much or has any need to keep a schedule selects no layovers.
Acorn
May 22, 8:07am
Even flying to Japan we only had one layover. I would never do 2 layovers.
maxpowers
May 22, 8:31am
Probably option 1, option 2 makes it easier to take an Uber to/from the airport
thewaterboy
May 22, 8:33am
Totally depends on the airports
BlueMatter
May 22, 8:42am
Both airports are very easy to use. Airport in Option 1 is a little bigger, but these aren't your JFKs, ORDs, LAXs, ATLs
rainorsnow
May 22, 10:06am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad
