Taking a recurring character which had been a mainstay in cinema for half a century

Report problem with this ad

Aug 20, 2019
12:52:20pm

Indy Coug Loquacious Lummox

and making her a woman is even odder.

Report problem with this ad

Indy Coug

Bio page: Indy Coug
Joined: Dec 20, 2001
Last login: Jun 20, 2024
Total posts: 185,566 (9,879 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

RE: Bond 25 is no more. Officially called "No Time to Die"...

TADOW

8/20/19 12:36pm

I don't know, but that is an excellent analogy.

CDV

8/20/19 12:37pm

You should just not watch it. Don't like the completely unnecessary gender change nonsense of

Indy Coug

8/20/19 12:40pm

Exactly

cougarmanguy

8/20/19 12:49pm

Not seeing a movie because the main character is a woman seems really odd.

The Dude Abides

8/20/19 12:50pm

Taking a recurring character which had been a mainstay in cinema for half a century

Indy Coug

8/20/19 12:52pm

Not necessarily since 007 is a title held by the agent. Doesn’t mean it has to be male.

The Dude Abides

8/20/19 12:57pm

Not seeing a movie because a supporting character is a woman is even odder

Coop

8/20/19 12:55pm

It's not like they made James Bond trans. 007 being passed to a woman is NBD.

mik3

8/20/19 1:09pm

RE: It's not like they made James Bond trans. 007 being passed to a woman is NBD.

Indy Coug

8/20/19 1:17pm

It’s just a movie.

Natedog916

8/20/19 12:42pm

If I can suspend disbelief that the same character has been around for almost 60 years and is roughly the same age

Pete

8/20/19 1:17pm

#MeT007

Posting on CougarBoard