Is that what you think we have to combat the flu?

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Mar 19, 2020
9:39:19am

YIsForBrigham Poo Poo

Is that what you think we have to combat the flu?

Report problem with this ad

YIsForBrigham

Previous username: TrueAndBlue
Bio page: YIsForBrigham
Joined: Aug 9, 2012
Last login: Jun 1, 2024
Total posts: 65,602 (17,812 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

There needs to be a frank public discussion about the value of human life.

boogers

3/19/20 9:34am

Sounds like we need to set up death panels

DapperDan

3/19/20 9:36am

His point is that we have. We don’t shut down the country for 80,000 lives

Brigham

3/19/20 9:37am

Sure Dan. That's a valid response. How much do YOU think we should pay

boogers

3/19/20 9:38am

Is that what you think we have to combat the flu?

3/19/20 9:39am

I'm not sure what you are asking. Regardless of what he have to combat

boogers

3/19/20 9:41am

To combat the flu we have vaccines that many people eschew, and antiviral

DapperDan

3/19/20 9:41am

We could also mandate current measures and drastically reduce that number even

boogers

3/19/20 9:42am

Yet 80,000 people still die and we as a society accept that. Sad. But true.

3/19/20 9:45am

RE: There needs to be a frank public discussion about the value of human life.

BigTex

3/19/20 9:37am

Also about saving for rainy days

Gustav

3/19/20 9:39am

I think it goes to show that the government is expecting far more

kimdaddy35

3/19/20 9:46am

I'm not sure that is true. I think if politicians tried to say 80k is acceptable

boogers

3/19/20 9:48am

Again if you look at the timeline we reacted right after Imperial

kimdaddy35

3/19/20 9:52am

So we think 2.2 million it too many. What number is OK and when will we know

boogers

3/19/20 9:58am

Good questions that would be debated in Congress for

kimdaddy35

3/19/20 10:03am

How many people would have died if we didn’t do this social distancing thing? That’s the number we need to compare to

shimmy

3/19/20 9:48am

I don't know what the number is. It is at least 80k. But we should be

boogers

3/19/20 9:50am

Agreed. I hope we don’t bail out big businesses. 0-interest loans maybe. I hope the only people bailed out are small

shimmy

3/19/20 10:00am

Agree 100%

cougfanz

3/19/20 10:08am

Tough conversation to have as a republican/conservative given abortion

3/19/20 10:20am

Also undermines an anti-euthanasia stance, especially for older people.

3/19/20 10:26am

yup.

boogers

3/19/20 10:40am

Not really. Electing to actively end the life of another human verse allowing nature to run its course is not close to

3/19/20 10:46am

The philosophy on this is not nearly as settled as you are proclaiming.

joelvandyne

3/19/20 10:51am

I'm not saying the debate over how much we should do to save lives is settled, but conflating abortion verse

3/19/20 12:00pm

If they're not struggling with that, they should. That is, at least if they want

joelvandyne

3/19/20 12:40pm

There is no persuasion in the abortion debate. It’s a fool’s errand

3/19/20 1:33pm

What a defeatist, self-fulfilling prophecy.

joelvandyne

3/19/20 7:51pm

By choosing economy over life saving actions, it's very comparable.

3/19/20 10:54am

It's not

3/19/20 11:57am

Fair enough.

3/19/20 12:53pm

It's part of a larger convo on end of life care

runnincoug

3/19/20 10:23am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad