I guess from Utah's perspective it's a win-win, but that doesn't mean it's a lose-lose for me.

You may not like the exchange rate on the trade-off, giving up something bad (BYU losses to Utah, Utah med school publicity) to get something good (cheap, effective cure for cancer), but let's not pretend there's no benefit anywhere in this deal

As mentioned elsewhere, I've got a young kid with cancer. So I understand someone saying "No, because it's the devil" (that was my response), or even "No, the trade-off asks too much" (even if I strongly disagree), but someone saying "there's no wins in this deal, only losses, no trade-off because nothing good comes from it" is something I legitimately can't understand