I'm sure they think so.

Sign up, and you'll be able to ignore users whose posts you don't want to see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Sep 28, 2022
12:43:39pm

shoganai Truly Addicted User

I'm sure they think so.

I doubt the B1G cares.

Report problem with this ad

shoganai

Bio page: shoganai
Joined: Jul 15, 2004
Last login: Jun 14, 2024
Total posts: 32,051 (790 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I think if the B1G was going to invite anybody else it already would have.

shoganai

9/28/22 12:38pm

Oregon and Washington seem too big to be in a USC-less pac 10

Hsaru

9/28/22 12:43pm

I'm sure they think so.

shoganai

9/28/22 12:43pm

IF numbers come out to what is reported there is a real potential P12 makes $20M less than B12.

(Private)

9/28/22 12:51pm

They'll probably want an unequal share which further reduces other teams share.

ManicBlue

9/28/22 2:49pm

Thanks, George

RenoCoug

9/28/22 12:48pm

The Big Ten is getting another swing at a media rights package that will

Doogal McCougar

9/28/22 12:58pm

Probably a lot

TNT

9/28/22 1:02pm

If I were the B1G, I’d try to undermine the ACC. UNC, UVA, Pitt, Ga Tech, Duke

Ski-U-Mah

9/28/22 2:17pm

The P12-2 remaining schools give USC and UCLA more local games. Also gives the B1G more inventory for

ManicBlue

9/28/22 2:53pm

I get it. I’m sure the B1G is adding more Pacific time teams. But don’t really

Ski-U-Mah

9/28/22 3:19pm

I'm sure the B1G has their eyes on some ACC teams along with the SEC and B12.

ManicBlue

9/28/22 3:24pm

Interesting who the Big Ten big boys actually schedule OOC from the PAC and ACC

Doogal McCougar

9/28/22 4:15pm

I tend to agree. There are four schools in the ACC that make the

Nat Gas Man

9/28/22 5:23pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad