more than Stanton (although I see above in my response to "who's more deserving" I said Stanton, although I was thinking who is more likely to win). As I've said throughout this thread elsewhere, I think Kershaw deserves it. I think he has been slightly more valuable than Stanton (and, as you noted, WAR agrees). That said, Stanton does provide more value per-AB than Kershaw, especially when you put park effects into the equation. Like I said, I'm looking at all the stats.