My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 8, 2015
5:39
:11
pm
Blue Cat
I'll trade 1 year of Mangum for 1 year of Taysom.
Mangum is great and he's going to be better, but I can't imagine him being as good as Taysom next year (assuming Taysom is able to be close to what he once was).
Don't redshirt Mangum. We will likely need him next year anyway.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Blue Cat
Bio page
Blue Cat
Joined
Aug 24, 2006
Last login
Jun 20, 2024
Total posts
13,910 (8 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
I have a hard time seeing Taysom regaining the starting QB job.
SpiffCoug
10/8/15 5:30pm
But more thought goes into the kids at the college level.
Cougarrrs
10/8/15 5:34pm
RSing Mangum does a lot of damage if he wants to play on Sundays.
SpiffCoug
10/8/15 5:36pm
Well that's pretty subjective
southernfriedcougar
10/8/15 5:43pm
I'll trade 1 year of Mangum for 1 year of Taysom.
Blue Cat
10/8/15 5:39pm
Taysom comes back and competes for the starting job. He likely wins it.
byujdmba
10/8/15 5:39pm
Taysom hasn't "started the last 3 years" he's started games in the last 3 years
SpiffCoug
10/8/15 5:46pm
No. 1 QB out of camp each of the last 3 seasons.
byujdmba
10/8/15 11:16pm
I'd rather just start with Mangum.
Mr Bassman
10/8/15 5:46pm
WHEN Taysom comes back the starting job is his.
HarlemCoug
10/8/15 5:53pm
Taysom would probably have been an NLF safety if he'd have started in that
Virginia Ute
10/8/15 5:47pm
Or LB. Or WR. Who knows? He's a heck of an athlete.
mantis mutu
10/8/15 5:49pm
Taysom QBR as a JR 142, Mangum 121 so far
g$
10/8/15 6:03pm
<< Deleted >>
TrackCoug
10/8/15 6:15pm
You forget 2013
southernfriedcougar
10/8/15 6:19pm
I totally did! Never mind.
TrackCoug
10/8/15 6:20pm
in the last two years that is. Taysom started all 13 in 2013
SpiffCoug
10/8/15 6:19pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad