I wouldn't if I had more than one year's worth of data and it said something

Sign up, and CougarBoard will remember which categories you want to view. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 29, 2016
10:51:40am

ChinoCoug All-American

I wouldn't if I had more than one year's worth of data and it said something

else.

Report problem with this ad

ChinoCoug

New username: BeefNoodleSoup
Bio page: ChinoCoug
Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Last login: Aug 21, 2017
Total posts: 0 (0 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

it's not a simplistic explanation, it's a deterministic one

BYUtiful

1/29/16 6:21am

favorited

ChinoCoug

1/29/16 6:50am

it would be even better if you and all your friends POTD'ed it, as it would

BYUtiful

1/29/16 7:55am

No one reads analytics posts.

ChinoCoug

1/29/16 8:06am

as in 0% of all Cougarboarders or simply a small number, say 30%?

Cougarclaw

1/29/16 8:32am

Don't have a precise #. I based this on how many people actually respond to

ChinoCoug

1/29/16 10:30am

<< Deleted >>

Abe Froman

1/29/16 9:27am

He only uses one year of data. Not robust.

ChinoCoug

1/29/16 10:30am

all i know is, if i were a gambler, i'd probably change my strategy in light of

BYUtiful

1/29/16 10:43am

I wouldn't if I had more than one year's worth of data and it said something

ChinoCoug

1/29/16 10:51am

which could be the case--or not; definitely worth further research

BYUtiful

1/29/16 10:55am

You can't publish peer review if you only use one year.

ChinoCoug

1/30/16 5:10am

sounds like a piece of uncharted territory ripe for additional research

BYUtiful

1/30/16 10:57am

"Moreover, recruiting is traditionally been range-bound: teams rarely make

ChinoCoug

1/29/16 10:58am

My dad rowed crew in college.

1/29/16 11:44am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad