Nov 11, 2017
10:35:53pm
10:35:53pm
I think you've got it about backwards.
I think he avoids a clear claim for defamation by not stating that Nick did something that can be verified.
He brings up a possible honor code investigation, but doesn't clearly state that Nick violated the honor code.
It is hard to find a statement that could be proved false.
He brings up a possible honor code investigation, but doesn't clearly state that Nick violated the honor code.
It is hard to find a statement that could be proved false.
- New username
- Madam Pattirini
- Bio page
- CosmoK
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Last login
- Jul 28, 2021
- Total posts
- 0 (0 FO)
