If they wanted 2-3 more years of Brady, yes they would have to give him away.

Sign up, and you can customize which countdowns you see. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 5, 2018
11:58:23am

texbird33 Walk-on

If they wanted 2-3 more years of Brady, yes they would have to give him away.

Report problem with this ad

texbird33

Bio page: texbird33
Joined: May 9, 2011
Last login: May 8, 2024
Total posts: 2,437 (89 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

ESPN has basically written an article every year since 2005 on the Pats dynasty

texbird33

1/5/18 11:55am

And give away the future quarterback

Crush4

1/5/18 11:56am

If they wanted 2-3 more years of Brady, yes they would have to give him away.

texbird33

1/5/18 11:58am

I've been asking it since he was traded. Please tell me how they were

CougsBeatU

1/5/18 11:58am

They weren't and Bill and Kraft knew it. That's why they got the 2nd rounder.

texbird33

1/5/18 11:59am

You and I both know this, but people spout off like they screwed up.

CougsBeatU

1/5/18 12:00pm

At 40, you move off him if you have the future there

Crush4

1/5/18 12:04pm

Same with Aaron Rodgers in Green Bay and farve leaving

cougarfann888

1/5/18 12:20pm

That is a very hard thing to do. With Brady you have a very good chance to win

Nathanael Greene

1/5/18 12:36pm

This man gets it.

CougsBeatU

1/5/18 12:43pm

Unless you upset Belichick which is the biggest reason

kimdaddy35

1/5/18 1:00pm

You know they could have easily gotten more for him right?

1/5/18 12:07pm

It’s really hard for me to believe BB intends to stick around given that he basically

hansel

1/5/18 12:17pm

Brady, Manning, Rogers. All better than Montana.

RdF3

1/5/18 12:23pm

I would add others as well

kimdaddy35

1/5/18 12:58pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad