Why wouldn't they? It was the legitimate NC of the time.

Report problem with this ad

Feb 12, 2019
9:32:17am

andrewg3 Walk-on

Report problem with this ad

andrewg3

Previous username: Agarrett321
Bio page: andrewg3
Joined: Jul 19, 2016
Last login: Nov 28, 2023
Total posts: 3,212 (5 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

To the chagrin of the Utes the rest of CFB still recognizes our NC.

Ned Schneebly

2/12/19 7:54am

Except...

rggee

2/12/19 8:03am

UCF is on there, for example.

rggee

2/12/19 8:05am

so Utes "NC" not even listed among the illegitimate ones then...interesting.

HeismanTy

2/12/19 8:55am

To be fair, this one lists them as alternative choices for 2008 and 2004

Florwood

2/12/19 9:11am

But it’s titled a list of THE “definitive” champs. Which includes BYU, USC, and Florida for those years. Utah isn’t one

mvtoro

2/12/19 10:05am

2004 is a joke. There wasn't another team that could play with USC that year

slatecoug

2/12/19 12:05pm

Why wouldn't they? It was the legitimate NC of the time.

andrewg3

2/12/19 9:32am

It’s the land of participation trophies now!

Gathers

2/12/19 10:00am

Even uu fans recognize the unanimous 1984 BYU NC title.

Benfica1

2/12/19 10:16am

True. We may not like it, or try to argue it was weak or shouldn't have

kos

2/12/19 3:53pm

I fail to see why the Utes are even relevant in this conversation. Why bring the

Cougar8Duck

2/12/19 8:24pm

Because we are now the little brother. We're obsessed.

calbearcoug

2/13/19 8:04am

Some fans are little brother. Leave the rest of us out of it.

Benfica1

2/13/19 8:08am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad