Mar 25, 2019
10:03:46pm
10:03:46pm
No I’m not
Booker 25.6 ppg
Mitchell 23.6 ppg
Booker 4.2 rpg
Mitchell 4.1 rpg
Booker 6.8 apg
Mitchell 4.1 apg
Booker 45% fg
Mitchell 43% fg
Booker 57.1 TS%
Mitchell 53.1 TS%
Booker 50.7 efg%
Mitchell 49.0 efg%
Booker 85.9 ft%
Mitchell 79.7 ft%
Booker .359 ft rate
Mitchell .249 ft rate
Mitchell 23.6 ppg
Booker 4.2 rpg
Mitchell 4.1 rpg
Booker 6.8 apg
Mitchell 4.1 apg
Booker 45% fg
Mitchell 43% fg
Booker 57.1 TS%
Mitchell 53.1 TS%
Booker 50.7 efg%
Mitchell 49.0 efg%
Booker 85.9 ft%
Mitchell 79.7 ft%
Booker .359 ft rate
Mitchell .249 ft rate
Originally posted on Mar 25, 2019 at 10:03:46pm
Message modified by PHXSUNS31 on Mar 25, 2019 at 10:04:38pm
- Previous username
- ZonaCougar12
- Bio page
- PHXSUNS31
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
- Last login
- May 26, 2024
- Total posts
- 21,067 (1 FO)
Messages
Time
This isn’t even a maybe. DM is better than him in virtually every aspect of the game. Better ball handler, better
3/25/19 9:44pm
3/25/19 9:45pm
Why would they do that. Name a category where Booker brings more to the table than DM. There isn’t one.
3/25/19 9:49pm
3/25/19 9:53pm
3/25/19 9:53pm
3/25/19 10:03pm
Significantly more assists? 4.1 vs 4.2 per game. Assist to turnover ratio DM is actually significantly better.
3/25/19 9:54pm
3/25/19 10:08pm
3/25/19 10:16pm