I don't think there was ever a question if Ingram would be included

Jun 15, 2019
7:40:47pm

Huge Manatee All-American

He is far and away the best prospect on the Lakers and no deal would have gotten done without him. I think he is all-star material.

I think the question came down to if they could do the deal without Kuzma and the price was two extra draft picks.

This message has been modified

Originally posted on Jun 15, 2019 at 7:40:47pm

Message modified by Huge Manatee on Jun 15, 2019 at 7:41:34pm

Report problem with this ad

Huge Manatee

Previous username: Bronoc
Bio page: Huge Manatee
Joined: Mar 14, 2011
Last login: Apr 26, 2024
Total posts: 51,675 (5,591 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

POLL: What do you believe re: Ingram and Kuzma?

BGRTHNUMEGO

6/15/19 7:32pm

Ingram and Ball had to be part of the deal to make salaries work

Huge Manatee

6/15/19 7:36pm

Even if that is true, it doesn’t change what the Pels’ preference was

BGRTHNUMEGO

6/15/19 7:38pm

I don't think there was ever a question if Ingram would be included

Huge Manatee

6/15/19 7:40pm

Lots of folks on twitter think LA kept their best young player.

BGRTHNUMEGO

6/15/19 7:42pm

Yeah that's completely wrong if they are saying that

Huge Manatee

6/15/19 7:42pm

Maybe true, but Kuzma is definitely a better fit in LA than Ingram

PHXSUNS31

6/15/19 7:54pm

The blood clot issue is risky

donnerstag

6/15/19 8:09pm

Not as risky as you think. Isn’t the same as Bosh

PHXSUNS31

6/15/19 8:11pm

I think Lakers definitely preferred Kuzma of the three

BrutustheBrash

6/15/19 7:59pm

If so, possibly due to his contract

Huge Manatee

6/15/19 8:21pm

Kuzma over Ingram? LOL

Josef K

6/16/19 2:11am

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad