Aug 8, 2019
9:27:24am
9:27:24am
One reason those %'s are higher is for the most part they were only shooting
wide open shots.
That's a huge reason why they took fewer and had higher %'s. It's almost certain had they been shooting more those %'s would be lower.
I definitely get your point though. There was an old school thought of needing to get shots closer to the hoop and an outside shot being a "bad shot". It's a great example of the old school thought of "well this is the way it's always been done" prevailing but eventually being disrupted and changed.
That's a huge reason why they took fewer and had higher %'s. It's almost certain had they been shooting more those %'s would be lower.
I definitely get your point though. There was an old school thought of needing to get shots closer to the hoop and an outside shot being a "bad shot". It's a great example of the old school thought of "well this is the way it's always been done" prevailing but eventually being disrupted and changed.
Originally posted on Aug 8, 2019 at 9:27:24am
Message modified by RdF3 on Aug 8, 2019 at 9:30:58am
- Previous username
- swishh_15
- Bio page
- RdF3
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2011
- Last login
- May 8, 2024
- Total posts
- 39,982 (2,658 FO)
