Since when does going 0-2 against top 25 teams make you a legit top 10 team? Utah may be a top 20 team, but legit top 10 teams win games against other top 25 teams.

#1 Ohio State beat #8 Wisconsin, #14 Michigan, and #10 Penn State

#2 LSU beat #11 Auburn and #12 Alabama

#3 Clemson is undefeated, defending champs, will beat #23 Virginia, beat Texas A&M who went 7-5 in the SEC West

#4 Georgia beat #9 Florida and #15 ND

#6 Oklahoma beat #25 Oklahoma State and #7 Baylor

#7 Baylor beat #25 Oklahoma State

#8 Wisconsin beat #18 Minnesota and #14 Michigan

#9 Florida beat #11 Auburn

#10 Penn State beat #14 Michigan

#11 Auburn beat #12 Bama

#12 Bama is the first team besides Utah without a top 25 win

#13 Oregon pounded “#5 Utah”

#14 Michigan beat #16 Iowa and #15 ND

#15 ND beat #23 Virginia, #22 USC, and #24 Navy

#16 Iowa beat #18 Minnesota

#17 Memphis beat #24 Navy and #20 Cinci

#18 Minnesota beat #10 Penn Stat

#19 Boise State is the next team without a top 25 win

#20 Cinci also does not have a top 20 win

My analysis of the Utes has nothing to do with BYU. I know that BYU is mediocre, and I don’t live out west so I don’t have to listen to the red kool aid that Utah’s local media serves.

You on the other hand cannot separate your feelings about BYU from your analysis of Utah. It all revolves around Utah’s winning streak against BYU for you. It’s as unreasonable as your opinion of Bronco. Nothing about Utah’s resume suggests they’re anything better than a top 20 team at best. Their best win is a 5 point win against 7-5 Washington. That is no way worthy of a top 10 ranking and it’s hilarious you continue to try to argue that despite being blown out by Oregon. Utah dominating the South says more about the lowliness of the PAC12 than the quality of Utah football.