My Account
Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more!
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Mar 22, 2020
2:58
:21
pm
Endocoug
All-American
It’s based on modeling. Dr. F discussed this.
The number #10 is not so important just that in the modeling they performed, “10” was the one that consistently slowed the progression of a problem.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Endocoug
Previous username
berkleycoug
Bio page
Endocoug
Joined
Jul 17, 2005
Last login
May 1, 2024
Total posts
10,700 (197 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
One thing I wonder
TwinsRight
Contributor
3/22/20 2:51pm
It's a subjective number as far as I've been informed. Just trying to keep
SouthernBlueBlood
3/22/20 2:52pm
Because if you say “small groups”, it can be interpreted as anything.
The Dude Abides
3/22/20 2:55pm
There was some article that got passed around a week or two ago
buffgato
3/22/20 2:55pm
Imagine everyone has a 1% chance of being infected. In a group of 100,
Hinta
3/22/20 2:56pm
They just picked it. Has no medical significance. Much like most of this shut
777
3/22/20 2:56pm
It’s based on modeling. Dr. F discussed this.
Endocoug
3/22/20 2:58pm
The only contradictory thing is that 90% of people contracted it from
CSoul
3/22/20 3:02pm
Can you imagine how many more would be infected had groups not been limited?
Endocoug
3/22/20 3:04pm
This wasn't just in places where it was limited. It appears
CSoul
3/22/20 3:06pm
Because if it was 11 people would question it. Not many will question 10
gwill
3/22/20 3:00pm
They surveyed 100 introverts and that was the average they gave
Busiturtle
3/22/20 3:02pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad