My Account
Sign up, and you can make all message times appear in your timezone.
Sign up
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Oct 17, 2020
8:00
:35
am
Jacksonian76
Contributor
I said the same thing. I don't think they should be able
To eject on a targeting call that was made off of the replay. It's a bad rule. "Technically Targeting" should not carry an ejection penalty.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Jacksonian76
Bio page
Jacksonian76
Joined
Oct 11, 2013
Last login
Mar 19, 2024
Total posts
679 (3 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
I just realized that Houston only had 8 yards of offense in the 2nd half
Duke Silver
10/17/20 7:40am
That drive was like this
Mr. Rumsfield
10/17/20 7:44am
Their yardage would've been negative if not for that targeting penalty.
dYrtbYkerYder
10/17/20 7:44am
I do not like the idea that you can review for targeting when the penalty isn’t
Duke Silver
10/17/20 7:47am
I watched that play a couple more times at full speed. Looked clean.
rtNelson
10/17/20 7:52am
But wasn’t that how Wisdom got tossed last week?
BigBlue04
10/17/20 7:52am
I said the same thing. I don't think they should be able
Jacksonian76
10/17/20 8:00am
I'd like a time limit. Not just before the next snap.
Y05
10/17/20 8:02am
I'd change it so that a penalty has to have been called on that player
CougarVeteran
10/17/20 11:15am
I’ll never forget Nevada 2002....
idacoug
10/17/20 7:53am
RE: I’ll never forget Nevada 2002....
TunaNoCrust
10/17/20 10:37am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad