ranking systems included on the official NCAA team sheets. NIT, SOR, and KPI (which has yet to be released this year) seem to have higher correlation with seeding than KenPom, Sagarin, or BPI. Here's how BYU compares to the teams I have below them as of right now in NET, Strength of Record, and records for Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4:

BYU:
41 NET, 32 SOR
2-3 vs Q1, 0-0 vs Q2, 0 Q3/Q4 losses

Oklahoma:
50 NET, 41 SOR
1-3 vs Q1, 1-2 vs Q2, 0 Q3/Q4 losses

Stanford
54 NET, 33 SOR
2-2 vs Q1, 0-1 vs Q2, 0 Q3/Q4 losses

Syracuse
38 NET, 75 SOR
0-1 vs Q1, 0-1 vs Q2, 0 Q3/Q4 losses

Michigan St
86 NET, 61 SOR
0-3 vs Q1, 2-1 vs Q2, 0 Q3/Q4 losses

Duke
111 NET, 72 SOR
0-1 vs Q1, 0-0 vs Q2, 1 Q3 loss

VCU
30 NET, 31 SOR
0-2 vs Q1, 2-0 vs Q2, 1 Q3 loss

Purdue
43 NET, 37 SOR
0-4 vs Q1, 4-1 vs Q2, 0 Q3/Q4 losses

Oklahoma St
44 NET, 44 SOR
3-2 vs Q1, 0-0 vs Q2, 1 Q3 loss

Northwestern
60 NET, 50 SOR
1-3 vs Q1, 1-1 vs Q2, 0 Q3/Q4 losses

Richmond
70 NET, 35 SOR
0-1 vs Q1, 3-1 vs Q2, 1 Q3 loss