"quality" ranks. NET is kind of considered a hybrid of the 2 and is what they use to rate the quality of wins/losses for each team.

Over the last few years KPI has actually had the strongest correlation to final seed list of all the ones included on the team sheets, with NET and SOR also having higher correlation than the 3 "quality" ranks. Of the 3 "quality" ranks i would put KenPom on top, but the committee seems to lean more heavily towards the "resume" ranks in their seeding.