There is no way the refs could have called that targeting.

Sign up, and you'll be able to customize your font size and more! Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 17, 2021
10:01:48pm

All-American All-American

There is no way the refs could have called that targeting.

... because there is no “targeting” foul in the NFL.

But definitely could have or should have been personal foul for helmet to helmet contact.

Report problem with this ad

All-American

Previous username: all_american01
Bio page: All-American
Joined: Sep 5, 2001
Last login: Apr 27, 2024
Total posts: 14,952 (48 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I didn’t watch live so I’m sure this was debated big time, but how in the

1/17/21 9:09pm

Refs missed it in real time and it’s not reviewable

backprop

1/17/21 9:09pm

That’s the only thing that makes sense

1/17/21 9:14pm

the fumble took all their focus

BlueFrog

1/17/21 9:13pm

I’m pretty stunned at the no call. Obviously a huge no-call at that point in the

runitup590

1/17/21 9:14pm

The ref's focus is on the sideline and the ball to see if he goes out of bounds

wjman11

1/17/21 9:29pm

There is no way the refs could have called that targeting.

1/17/21 10:01pm

It's probably because it was on the goal line. Pretty tough situation there

rtNelson

1/17/21 10:09pm

Not to mention, the ref is definitely watching the ball there.

rtNelson

1/17/21 10:14pm

I just don’t know the rules that well. I thought it was reviewable. Now that I

1/17/21 11:42pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad