There’s an inherent inverse relationship between number of players on a team

Sign up, and you'll be able to vote in polls. Sign up

Report problem with this ad

Jan 18, 2021
2:23:33pm

NottherealJWill Contributor

There’s an inherent inverse relationship between number of players on a team

And effect that each player has on said team.

Report problem with this ad

NottherealJWill

Bio page: NottherealJWill
Joined: Dec 2, 2015
Last login: May 2, 2024
Total posts: 982 (14 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

Parity Across Major Leagues

1/18/21 2:15pm

The main reason is because it is a star driven league with limited stars, and

ZacSeljaas'Stache

1/18/21 2:18pm

That's definitely true now. There's no question that you see more player-formed

1/18/21 2:21pm

Was only like 8 teams through the 60’s. And big name players have always

PHXSUNS31

1/18/21 4:07pm

There’s an inherent inverse relationship between number of players on a team

NottherealJWill

1/18/21 2:23pm

With Quarterback being one key exception - Most important player in sports

ZacSeljaas'Stache

1/18/21 2:24pm

It’s close, how many non star QB’s have won Super Bowls?

PHXSUNS31

1/18/21 4:20pm

The nature of the game lends itself to dominance by elite stars. So if you

garyfan

1/18/21 2:21pm

Like others have said, it’s mostly due to number of players on the court

PHXSUNS31

1/18/21 4:11pm

Report problem with this ad

Posting on CougarBoard

In order to post, you will need to either sign up or log in.

Report problem with this ad