I'm sure analytics people would tell you that it increases your chances of

Report problem with this ad

Jan 24, 2021
6:25:29pm

cougaman Intervention Needed

winning the game, which is why you have to look at situations beyond analytics and see that they are sometimes wrong.

Report problem with this ad

cougaman

Bio page: cougaman
Joined: Mar 11, 2006
Last login: May 7, 2024
Total posts: 68,690 (4,461 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I'm sure this was discussed an hour ago, but... Why is down 5 without the ball

LeftOfNormal

1/24/21 6:23pm

I'm sure analytics people would tell you that it increases your chances of

cougaman

1/24/21 6:25pm

If analytics actually says you should kick the FG there I don't want to see

Magathisll

1/24/21 6:27pm

Analytics would tell you that your odds of winning increase with the FG, I'm

cougaman

1/24/21 6:29pm

They were basically treating the FG as a 3-pt conversion and getting it before the TD. The Problem is you’re asking

SpiffCoug

1/24/21 7:03pm

Right. I don't agree with the decision, but I don't doubt that analytics would

cougaman

1/24/21 7:48pm

NFL scripting sorry it just is. No flags except to benefit the Brady bunch

towerman

1/24/21 8:11pm

And I’m sure analytics told them to go for two before the 4th quarter started

rainorsnow

1/24/21 6:28pm

Crazy to go with the aggressive option to go for 2 early but then not go for

Magathisll

1/24/21 6:29pm

They didn't go for 2 early. They waited until their 2nd TD. I think he's saying

cougaman

1/24/21 6:31pm

I find it I interesting that the people so certain Brady can't be stopped

Busiturtle

1/24/21 6:55pm

I think it's a defensible decision

The Shazad

1/24/21 7:05pm

LaFleur has been a pretty good coach and made most of the right calls his first 2 years. Today was a huge miss.

Posting on CougarBoard