My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Jan 24, 2021
6:28
:11
pm
rainorsnow
And I’m sure analytics told them to go for two before the 4th quarter started
and I didn’t like it then and of course they didn’t convert.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
rainorsnow
Bio page
rainorsnow
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Last login
May 18, 2024
Total posts
19,128 (632 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
I'm sure this was discussed an hour ago, but... Why is down 5 without the ball
LeftOfNormal
1/24/21 6:23pm
I'm sure analytics people would tell you that it increases your chances of
cougaman
1/24/21 6:25pm
If analytics actually says you should kick the FG there I don't want to see
Magathisll
1/24/21 6:27pm
Analytics would tell you that your odds of winning increase with the FG, I'm
cougaman
1/24/21 6:29pm
They were basically treating the FG as a 3-pt conversion and getting it before the TD. The Problem is you’re asking
SpiffCoug
1/24/21 7:03pm
Right. I don't agree with the decision, but I don't doubt that analytics would
cougaman
1/24/21 7:48pm
NFL scripting sorry it just is. No flags except to benefit the Brady bunch
towerman
1/24/21 8:11pm
And I’m sure analytics told them to go for two before the 4th quarter started
rainorsnow
1/24/21 6:28pm
Crazy to go with the aggressive option to go for 2 early but then not go for
Magathisll
1/24/21 6:29pm
They didn't go for 2 early. They waited until their 2nd TD. I think he's saying
cougaman
1/24/21 6:31pm
I find it I interesting that the people so certain Brady can't be stopped
Busiturtle
1/24/21 6:55pm
I think it's a defensible decision
The Shazad
1/24/21 7:05pm
LaFleur has been a pretty good coach and made most of the right calls his first 2 years. Today was a huge miss.
unctoothman
1/24/21 7:24pm
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad