They didn't go for 2 early. They waited until their 2nd TD. I think he's saying

Jan 24, 2021
6:31:11pm

cougaman Intervention Needed

that they didn't follow analytics which would tell you to go for 2 at 16-28, but then followed it later, so they weren't consistent.

Report problem with this ad

cougaman

Bio page: cougaman
Joined: Mar 11, 2006
Last login: May 29, 2024
Total posts: 68,940 (4,567 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

I'm sure this was discussed an hour ago, but... Why is down 5 without the ball

LeftOfNormal

1/24/21 6:23pm

I'm sure analytics people would tell you that it increases your chances of

cougaman

1/24/21 6:25pm

If analytics actually says you should kick the FG there I don't want to see

Magathisll

1/24/21 6:27pm

Analytics would tell you that your odds of winning increase with the FG, I'm

cougaman

1/24/21 6:29pm

They were basically treating the FG as a 3-pt conversion and getting it before the TD. The Problem is you’re asking

SpiffCoug

1/24/21 7:03pm

Right. I don't agree with the decision, but I don't doubt that analytics would

cougaman

1/24/21 7:48pm

NFL scripting sorry it just is. No flags except to benefit the Brady bunch

towerman

1/24/21 8:11pm

And I’m sure analytics told them to go for two before the 4th quarter started

rainorsnow

1/24/21 6:28pm

Crazy to go with the aggressive option to go for 2 early but then not go for

Magathisll

1/24/21 6:29pm

They didn't go for 2 early. They waited until their 2nd TD. I think he's saying

cougaman

1/24/21 6:31pm

I find it I interesting that the people so certain Brady can't be stopped

Busiturtle

1/24/21 6:55pm

I think it's a defensible decision

The Shazad

1/24/21 7:05pm

LaFleur has been a pretty good coach and made most of the right calls his first 2 years. Today was a huge miss.

Posting on CougarBoard