Even based on FDA approval levels alone?

So you are saying there's no reason for any to investigate the safety of vaccines themselves especially with even emergency approved vaccines?

I see reason, I investigated, I got "A" Covid vaccine, but avoided the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. FDA first suspended and then pulled the Johnson and Johnson emergency approval. Are the long terms effects of any of them(covid vaccines) known yet? Your own word: bureaucracy is involved, not just science. People should be allowed to investigate and decide for themselves the competency of the science involved and how much bureaucracy was involved, seek council from their personal health provider(s) especially in regards to their personal health, read the literature and evidences, etc... ad nauseum.

I mean I agree and align with you personally for myself about getting "a" covid vaccine treatment, weighing the risks vs rewards, and got it.

But it sounds like:

You also believe that people, 1)Have no reason to investigate safety or be concerned and 2)Should not be able to decide their health for themselves and their family. If I understand you(and some other posters on this thread) correctly? I mean I personally feel like I can believe that someone else SHOULD get the vaccine for themselves BUT I also believe I shouldn't (or the government) decide that for them, especially blanket decision wise. I have to leave it in their court to decide, think context, case by case basis and personal freedom and decision making. AND I can respect that , even if I disagree with them.

That doesn't mean that there shouldn't be some level of BALANCE deciding rules and regulations, if any, and with no overreach, decided at a state level where possible, for those vaccinated and those not but let's be reasonable and sympathetic in regards to travel etc...but they made the decision and we should respect that.