My Account
Report problem with this ad
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Sep 24, 2022
11:04
:19
pm
Alpi Gusto
All-American
To all three of you, this is a response to the hypothetical "new" rule of
penalizing an offensive player for continuing to run after the whistle like they penalize a defensive player.
Start a related thread
Start a related poll
Reply via Boardmail
Report problem with this ad
Alpi Gusto
Previous username
(Private)
New username
RealTaysomHill
Bio page
Alpi Gusto
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Last login
Oct 18, 2022
Total posts
0 (0 FO)
Report problem with this ad
Messages
Author
Time
If they’re gonna penalize defenders for tackling after the whistle they should
CougfromtheSouth
9/24/22 10:57pm
That’s a valid argument.
HingleMcCringleberry
9/24/22 10:58pm
Why? A player running after the whistle doesn't do anything. They don't get
Alpi Gusto
9/24/22 11:00pm
It’s not only running, it’s handing the ball off to another player
LonePeakCoug
9/24/22 11:02pm
I think it’s possible that the RB didn’t bear the whistle either.
HingleMcCringleberry
9/24/22 11:02pm
Then call it consistent. Penalize both teams for playing after the whistle.
here's to hoping
9/25/22 1:33am
When you play football, hearing is one of your weakest senses. Sight and touch
CougfromtheSouth
9/24/22 11:03pm
To all three of you, this is a response to the hypothetical "new" rule of
Alpi Gusto
9/24/22 11:04pm
Let me be annoyed in peace
LonePeakCoug
9/24/22 11:07pm
Oops, my bad. No, actually that was a great call by the ref and BYU should be
Alpi Gusto
9/24/22 11:13pm
Glad you are here to be the voice of reason
LonePeakCoug
9/24/22 11:19pm
Incentive to keep playing after the whistle to catch defense into continuing to
here's to hoping
9/25/22 1:38am
What about tackling guys if there are no whistles? *eye roll.*
andrewg3
9/25/22 12:22am
Report problem with this ad
Posting on CougarBoard
In order to post, you will need to either
sign up
or
log in
.
Report problem with this ad