I'm 100% sure (this is cougarboard) they upheld on review because of the stink

Oct 4, 2022
9:30:50am

rcbyufan Intervention Needed

USU put up on their targeting. But as soon as the ref said crown of my the helmet I knew it would be overturned when they had time to look at it dispassionately. It was clearly not the crown of the helmet.

Report problem with this ad

rcbyufan

Bio page: rcbyufan
Joined: Aug 18, 2010
Last login: Apr 30, 2024
Total posts: 31,675 (1,086 FO)

Report problem with this ad

Messages

Author

Time

So with Jeudy-Lally’s targeting suspension appeal successful, does that mean

Skeptical Optimist

10/4/22 9:27am

I thought it wasn't even called on the field but reviewed after the play and added

2FarGone

10/4/22 9:28am

There was no call on the field. It was the booth official that initiated the

Six Foot Seven

10/4/22 9:29am

But then wasn't it the official on the field that makes the determination?

ReggaeCoug

10/4/22 9:30am

That wasn't my understanding, but I'm no expert on the process and who makes the

Six Foot Seven

10/4/22 9:32am

The booth official has the final word on all targeting penalties, since he is

Corn Pop

10/4/22 9:37am

They will use computers to determine what plays he would have made during the rest of the game

Sea Chicken

10/4/22 9:29am

I'm 100% sure (this is cougarboard) they upheld on review because of the stink

rcbyufan

10/4/22 9:30am

It shouldn't come with an ejection. Horse collar doesn't even come with an

Corn Pop

10/4/22 9:33am

His penalty almost seemed like a make up call for the USU targeting-which I think was also a questionable call.

kalifi

10/4/22 9:46am

RE: His penalty almost seemed like a make up call for the USU targeting-which I

Doogal McCougar

10/4/22 10:06am

Yes, in fact, they are going to take off the points USU scored on that drive.

Posting on CougarBoard